The Freshman 15 Writing Rules: The "Whichcraft" of Adjective Clauses

October 26th, 2010

We here at Knewton are feeling benevolent, so we have decided that it’s high time to roll out another of our Freshman 15 Writing Rules. We have heard your cries and felt your hunger, and in our infinite wisdom and mercy, we respond with a new grammar tip. Your prayers have been answered. The long wait is over.

Last time, we learned how to be a pro at pronouns. This week, we will examine an especially tricky rule concerning adjective clauses. This is another rule that is broken regularly in speech and writing, making related errors incredibly difficult to spot with an untrained eye.

So without further ado, we give you:

Rule 7. An adjective clause must describe the noun right before it

An adjective clause begins with the pronoun “which,” “that,” “who,” “whose,” or “whom” and describes a specific noun that must immediately precede the clause. If the adjective clause describes a different noun in the sentence or if there is no specific noun logically described, the clause is not correctly placed. Just as an adjective must describe a noun, so an adjective clause must also describe a noun.

For example, the sentence “A truck is speeding down the street that is the same color as a banana” is incorrect and should be written as “A truck that is the same color as a banana is speeding down the street.” The truck, not the street, is logically described as the same color as a banana.

In real life, the word “which” is frequently used to modify a general idea or an action hinted at by the preceding clause, but on the SAT, this is incorrect! When “which” introduces an adjective clause, make sure that the clause IMMEDIATELY follows the noun it modifies. If the clause introduced by “which” describes an abstract idea rather than a specific noun in the sentence, you’ve found a modifier error.

For example, “I drink a glass of warm milk, wash my face, and write in my journal every night before bed, which helps me fall asleep” is not correct because the clause beginning with which does not describe a single noun within the sentence. What noun, specifically, helps me fall asleep? The clause does not logically describe the noun, bed, that comes before it, and the idea that this routine helps me fall asleep cannot be described by the adjective clause.

Let’s take a stab at a revision: “Every night before bed, my routine, which helps me fall asleep, involves drinking a glass of warm milk, washing my face, and writing in my journal.” This sentence correctly uses the adjective clause beginning with which to describe the noun routine, and the verb helps agrees with the noun that is described, routine.

There is one exception to this rule about adjective clauses. When a noun followed by a prepositional phrase is described by an adjective clause, the clause can describe either the first noun or the noun after the preposition.

  • The presents for the party, which starts in three hours, have not been wrapped.
  • The presents for the party, which were purchased from the corner store, have not been wrapped.

Both sentences are correct. In the first, the clause which starts in three hours clearly describes the party. The verb is agrees with the singular noun described. In the second clause, which were purchased from the corner store clearly describes presents, and the verb were properly agrees with the plural noun described.

Precision is power. Make sure that each part of the sentences on the writing section of the SAT has a specific purpose and that it executes its purpose as clearly and concisely as possible. A sentence will almost never hint at an idea or refer to an entity that is not already present in the sentence. The clauses should fit together like a tightly woven web. Used correctly, an adjective clause, which must immediately follow the noun it describes, can serve as one of the web’s strongest threads.

GMAT History: How the GMAT has Changed Since the Old Days

October 26th, 2010

Thanks to a recent GMAT question archiving project, I had the opportunity to take a trip down GMAT memory lane. The things I uncovered about older GMAT questions were amusing — but they also illuminated how much the exam has evolved since it’s inception.

How would you have done on the GMAT of thirty years ago?

Language

To start, you’d have to get used to some pretty uncomfortable terminology. Did you know that GMAT RC passages once used phrases like “Oriental Jews”? Terms like these seem hilariously antiquated now, but at the time they actually made the test more difficult to navigate. If you were one of the ethnic groups problematically singled out for discussion, don’t you think it would a little tough to stay focused on your reading?

The language has gradually become more politically correct over time. Some time in the late 90’s, the word “Black” was swapped out of all Reading Comprehension passages and replaced with “African Americans.” Similarly “Oriental” became “Asian” at some point in the 80’s.

Controversy

What surprised me most about the reading passages was how much more controversial they used to be. Anyone who’s ever sampled the passages from an official guide is well aware of their anesthetic effect; to call them “bland” is an understatement. Yet I found a passage in the 1980 guide about the lightning-rod African-American poet Amiri Baraka, who advocated war against whites. Another passage from a few years later argues for socialism.

While these older passages were a bit more unpredictable, this actually made them more engaging and interesting to read. The passages about workplace sexism and affirmative action were refreshingly candid compared to the insipid, neutral fare foisted upon GMAT examinees today. Even the CR arguments were more interesting, as the test-writers frequently discussed controversial political issues and personalized them with fanciful names like “Mr. Primm.”

Format

The subject matter of the reading and reasoning sections is not the only major difference between the GMAT of today and of yesteryear. You may be intrigued to hear that the Critical Reasoning section replaced an earlier question type. It was called Analysis of Situations and it was BRUTAL.

These questions presented you with passages that were four times as long as those found in the RC section. We’re talking around 1200 – 1600 words. After slogging through it, you were charged with assessing the relative importance of certain passage details as they relate to some sort of business decision. The answer choices corresponded to passage details. You would mark A if the detail was an “objective” or mark E if the detail was an “unimportant issue.” B, C, and D, were for “major factors,” “minor factors,” and “assumptions” respectively. You could expect about sixteen questions, or, sixteen statements for each passage.

The length of the passage and the specificity of each detail you were asked to analyze really added to the unforgiving nature of this question type. Still, it struck me as a good test for an aspiring MBA. Business school students regularly have to analyze complicated situations and sift through a lot of irrelevant information. Regardless, GMAT students today should probably be glad that these analysis questions were replaced with the more concise, easier-to-manage CR problems.

Sort of makes you wonder what the GMAT will look like 30 years from now…

Law and Literature: 10 Books to Read for Legal Inspiration

October 26th, 2010

As any great lawyer or law professor will tell you, studying law is as much about the heart as it is about the mind. For years, law professors have woven works of literature into classes and seminars to tell the human stories behind each case. These stories provide the emotional complexity sometimes missing from contracts and statutes. Novels, poems, and plays can offer insights not only into legal concepts, but also into political values, cultural mores, and the psychology of criminals, victims, and prisoners.

Below are ten great works of literature guaranteed to make you think about the role the law plays in the human condition.

1. To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee

Atticus Finch is the paragon of the noble attorney. The trial of Tom Robinson, a black man accused of raping a white woman, is the focal point of the story, and civil rights and liberties are a central theme. It is safe to say that there are more than a few lawyers whose reading of this short novel determined the course of their careers.

2. Bleak House, by Charles Dickens

Considered canonical in the law and literature movement, Bleak House is a biting satire of bench and bar, organized around the lawsuit of “Jarndyce v. Jarndyce” in the Court of Chancery. Dickens employs all his literary tricks to denounce the legal system for its corruption and decay, but he does so optimistically, in the hope that each generation will improve on its failings and take one step closer to justice.

3. The Trial, by Franz Kafka

What if the basic legal rights we take for granted–a speedy and public trial, protection from unreasonable search and seizure, knowing the nature and cause of an accusation–were reversed? From its opening sentence, The Trial portrays just such a world, a judicial system turned terrifyingly on its head: “Someone must have slandered Josef K, for one morning, without having done anything wrong, he was arrested.”

4. Billy Budd, Sailor, by Herman Melville

The law is almost never black and white, and this classic text about the Indomitable, a warship in the British Navy (and a microcosm of political society), masterfully explores the gray areas of morality. In well under a hundred pages, Melville raises the fundamental questions in the philosophy of law, beginning with: What happens when the good guy becomes the criminal?

5. The Trial and Death of Socrates, by Plato

In one of history’s most famous trials, Socrates plays both defendant and defense attorney in a case for his life. This book is a compilation of four of Plato’s greatest dialogues and, in addition to being an excellent introduction to Western philosophy, is one of the most moving stories in literature.

6. The Merchant of Venice, by William Shakespeare

Pitting justice against mercy, the Bard dazzlingly analyzes the subtleties of law. In the process, he creates one of his most interesting and memorable villains, the moneylender Shylock, who is intent on carrying out a gruesome contractual obligation: “The pound of flesh which I demand of him is dearly bought. ‘Tis mine, and I will have it.”

7. Alias Grace, by Margaret Atwood

In 1843, a 16-year-old Canadian housemaid named Grace Marks was found guilty of the murder of her employer and his mistress. She spent the next thirty years in prisons and insane asylums. In a fictional retelling, Atwood embraces the ambiguity and mystery of the case, letting the reader decide what really happened in this riveting, emotionally charged tale.

8. A Passage to India, by E.M. Forster

The trial of Aziz, a young Muslim doctor in India accused of assaulting an Englishwoman, illuminates the tensions and prejudices that characterized the interactions between the Indian people and the British colonists who ruled India. In his masterpiece, Forster exhibits deep sympathy for his characters and an ability to see more than one side of an argument, both critical qualities for an aspiring attorney.

9. A Time to Kill, John Grisham

The first in Grisham’s long line of bestselling legal thrillers, A Time to Kill is both a gripping story of a father’s revenge on the rapists of his daughter and a profound exploration of the difference between what is illegal and what is wrong. It is a question as old as Sophocles’ Antigone: Do familial obligations supersede one’s duties to the law?

10. Snow Falling on Cedars, by David Guterson

A story of a murder trial, this haunting novel explores the nature of race relations, community, and war. Kabuo Miyamoto is accused of killing a man he believes has stolen his family’s land during the internment of Japanese Americans in World War II. As his drama unfolds, we’re left wondering about the proper role of law in a world governed by forces beyond our control, a world of chance and fate.

Workshop Added: How to Write Winning Admissions Essays

October 25th, 2010

New workshop added! Just like last week, our friends at College Essay Organizer are running a super-helpful admissions essay webinar. Check out the details, then click the link below to sign up!

How do you write college essays that help you stand out from thousands of other applicants? How can you manage all your different essays without going totally insane?

Organizing and writing your college essays is the most time-consuming and stressful part of the application process. This entertaining and informative webinar will show you how to handle the entire process with greater ease and success.

Parents and students will explore good and bad essay topics, essay do’s and don’ts, and even comical essay blunders. You’ll also have the opportunity to inquire about your own essays and get immediate feedback.

WHAT: How to Write Winning Admissions Essays Workshop

WHEN: Wednesday, October 27, 9-10pm EST

PARENTS AND STUDENTS, CLICK HERE TO REGISTER – IT’S FREE!

Dan Stern and Scott Farber run College Essay Organizer, and they have led college essay workshops for more than a decade, helping thousands of students write their way into the colleges of their dreams.

MBA News Roundup: The Anti-MBA, Major App Mistakes, and Defending Your B-School Choice

October 25th, 2010

Are you in the process of applying to business schools?  It’s crunch time for students hoping to get in for later round admissions.  If you’re still deciding where to apply, this week’s MBA news roundup features several articles that could help you out with the process.

1. The Anti-MBA School

If you considered yourself too non-traditional or humanities-oriented for business school, Poets and Quants highlights a potentially good fit: Johns Hopkins’ new Carey Business School.  Read more in this article to find out the goals of the school and what’s in store for future Carey grads. Read the rest of this entry »

MBA admissions myths of the 2010-11 season

October 25th, 2010

Recently, we spoke to MBA admissions expert Walter Hutchison (founder of ApplicationAdvantage.com and MBAdashboard.com) about the top 5 MBA admissions myths (if you missed that post, check it out here). This week, Walter digs into two pervasive MBA admissions myths specific to the 2010-11 application season.

Here are the biggest myths flying around this year:

1) The total volume of MBA applications began trending slightly lower in 2009-2010, so my odds of admission will go up.

Not entirely true. Competition, especially at the top schools, is always going to be fierce. The total number of application may also be less relevant depending on the admission demographic you represent. For instance, a negligible improvement in the absolute odds of admission is not going to outweigh the relatively high level of competition among applicants from South Asia, East Asia, Europe and the US. Moreover, you cannot make the assumption that the quality of the applicant pool will decline in line with the declining numbers of applications. Every year, the competitive standards at top schools tend to increase regardless of fluctuations in applicant pool size.

There’s another limitation to gaming applicant pool sizes: not even admissions committee members or officers know ahead of time exactly how many people will apply. So the hyper-accurate statistical information you would need in order to assess your chances in the season that you are applying, will ironically not become available until long AFTER you and every other candidate have submitted your applications. The most you would be able to do is make estimates based on historical trends and hope that there are not too many anomalies in your target season.

That’s why the best approach when deciding to apply, is to make certain that you never take anything for granted. Put in your best effort no matter what you think some survey’s results are telling you.

2) Since my company and career suffered a market-driven setback, top schools will think less of my applications.

False. Admissions committees are human and they are not going to hold you accountable for factors beyond your control. What committees will be interested in, though, is how you respond to this or any setback. What steps have you taken to make positive adjustments to your career trajectory? How have you applied your skills cross-functionally or to another area where your experience has become an asset? If you have more time available to you, how constructively have you used it? Your responses to all these types of questions can easily help you turn any perceived disadvantage into advantage. Approach your application with the same vigor and optimism as you would in better economic times. If your goals, rationale and potential for leadership are well-articulated, then there is every reason to believe that you will be a serious candidate for admission at the very top business schools.

Walter Hutchinson is the founder of ApplicationAdvantage.com, the boutique international admissions advisory, and also founder of MBAdashboard.com, the admissions supersite powered by proprietary technology tools designed specifically for global business school applicants. Walter holds degrees from Columbia University and has lived in North America, Asia and Europe while advising professionals and students representing more than 20 countries.

MBA Admissions Tip: Essay Basics

October 24th, 2010

Here’s another weekly MBA admissions tip from our friends at Clear Admit. For more advice about the b-school application process, check out their blog.

We often stress that, to present oneself effectively in one’s application essays, it is critical to think carefully about what a given question is asking and what this might indicate about a specific school’s admissions priorities.  Of course, it’s also imperative to communicate clearly and appropriately regardless of the target program or particular inquiry.  Today, we’re going back to basics and offering a few broadly applicable tips on tone and style to keep in mind when drafting written materials for your applications.

1. Be Professional. While a number of schools ask fun questions and most urge applicants to be themselves rather than submitting “overly polished” materials, it’s important to remember that this is a graduate school application and you should approach your essays with a degree of formality.  You do want your unique narrative voice to come through, but even professional writers know to vary their tone based on their audience.  As such, you should avoid using slang and conversational speech patterns in your writing.

2. Emphasize Action. A common pitfall for many applicants is lapsing into the passive voice, constructing sentences about how some unseen force or agent acted upon something or someone else (e.g. “we were required to” or “the project was completed”) rather than putting their own thoughts and actions at the fore.  By making a conscious effort to write “I/he/she did x” rather than “x was done to y” you can make your comments more informative, dynamic and, often, more concise.

3. Avoid Repetition. It’s often a good idea to give the reader a sense of an essay’s direction through an introduction and to sum up the key ideas through a conclusion, but ideally each sentence of an essay will add some new information to the document or build the reader’s understanding of what you’ve already written.  Keeping this rule in mind as you revise can help trim a response down to the word limit and ensure that you are including as much relevant information about your candidacy as you can within the allotted length.

This Fall: Join our free MBA workshops

October 24th, 2010

Applying to b-school? We’ve got your back.

This fall, we’re teaming up with some of our excellent MBA admissions partners for a free series of workshops to get you ready for the b-school application process — and for what you’ll experience once you’re accepted!

To join us, just enter your info and click the workshops you’d like to attend. Full workshop details are below.

Register now:


Upcoming workshops:

Raise Your MBA IQ: Preparing for Business Marketing

Thursday, 12/2, 6-7pm EST

When you get to b-school, will you be ready for Marketing 101? Get a jump on the core concepts of marketing and management, from the metrics you’ll need to know to strategies you’ll use in your future career.

5 Questions You Must Answer in Your B-School Application

Tuesday, 12/7, 6-7pm EST

Tyler will tell you exactly what admissions officers want to hear—and how to craft an application that addresses the questions they don’t ask in your application.

Past workshops:

25 tips for Building an Outstanding B-School Application

Thursday, 10/28, 7-8pm EST Watch the recording.

Tyler Cormney will outline a step-by-step plan for crafting an application that will make the best impression possible. Get tips about your transcripts, test scores, essay questions, and more!

What’s your MBA IQ?

Tuesday, 11/2, 8-9pm EST Watch the recording.

Are you ready to dive into your business management education? Devi Vallabhaneni, president of the Association of Professionals in Business Management, will show you what you need to know before your MBA studies even begin.

5 Steps to Being Accepted to Your Dream School

Tuesday, 11/16, 6-7pm EST Watch the recording.

Aiming for a top-tier b-school? Join Tyler Cormney from MBA Prep School for a rundown of the most important things you need to do to make the most selective MBA programs take notice. He’ll take you through the whole app process from foundation to execution.

Harvard, Wharton & Stanford: Navigating the Trilogy

Tuesday, 11/23, 7-8pm EST Watch the recording.

Are you applying to Harvard, Wharton or Stanford? If so, this webinar — by Brett Haber from Clear Admit — is a must! Learn more about each b-school’s philosophy, what types of leaders they seek, and how to best approach their essay questions. By the end of this workshop, you’ll know exactly what strengths to emphasize to make the best impression.

A little info about the experts:

Tyler CormneyTyler Cormney is a veteran MBA admissions consultant and co-founder of MBA Prep School, which helps MBA applicants get into the world’s best b-schools. He holds an MBA from Harvard and a Master’s in Professional Writing from USC, and his guides and e-books are used extensively by top admissions coaches across the country.

Devi Vallabhaneni is the founder of the Association of Professionals in Business Management (APBM). Before founding the APBM, she worked in international business development for Gap, inc. She’s a Harvard MBA, CPA, and CABM, and she has co-authored several review books to prepare professionals for certification exams in various business fields.

Brett Haber, a Clear Admit admissions expert, earned an MBA with a concentration in Finance from Wharton. She was a member of the admissions committee for several years after receiving her MBA, evaluating thousands of applications, conducting applicant interviews, and helping to promote ties within the Wharton alumni community.

A Yale Law grad on law school, the Constitution, and whether you should really get that J.D. (Part II)

October 23rd, 2010

Nick Pederson is a graduate of Yale Law School. He was gracious enough to answer some of our questions about law school, the legal field, and his current work. (Miss Part I of the interview? Check it out here.)

Some students reading this blog are particularly interested in obtaining a J.D and not practicing law. What kind of opportunities exist for this type of work? Would you recommend pursuing this path?

I think that, as a general matter, students who already know they don’t want to be practicing law in the long term should think very long and very hard about whether it makes sense to go to law school at all. Much of this is because getting a law degree has become a financially risky venture. But this soul-searching is especially necessary for people who don’t even want to be lawyers. People say, of course, that you can do anything with a law degree… the truth, I think, is more complicated… It is easy to enter law school repeating the “I can do anything with this!” mantra — many students do it every year. Soon, however, you realize you are very deep in debt. Read the rest of this entry »

Workshop: How to Write Winning Admissions Essays

October 21st, 2010

Hey SAT students: Tonight, our friends at College Essay Organizer are running a sweet admissions essay workshop. Check out the details below!

How do you write college essays that help you stand out from thousands of other applicants? How can you manage all your different essays without going totally insane?

Organizing and writing your college essays is the most time-consuming and stressful part of the application process. This entertaining and informative webinar will show you how to handle the entire process with greater ease and success.

Parents and students will explore good and bad essay topics, essay do’s and don’ts, and even comical essay blunders. You’ll also have the opportunity to inquire about your own essays and get immediate feedback.

WORKSHOP: How to Write Winning Admissions Essays

WHEN: Thursday, October 21, 7-8pm EST

PARENTS AND STUDENTS, CLICK HERE TO REGISTER – IT’S FREE!

Dan Stern and Scott Farber run College Essay Organizer, and they have led college essay workshops for more than a decade, helping thousands of students write their way into the colleges of their dreams.