College Readiness News Roundup: Cultural Hurdles to College, New Placement Test in Florida, and Blueprint for Education in Iowa

October 7th, 2011

In this week’s College Readiness News Roundup, check out articles about Florida’s new placement test, how schools are encouraging more rural students to go to college, and more.

1. Report Assessments for College Readiness in Florida

A new report details how Florida’s Division of Colleges and K-12 partners designed and launched a new placement test as a part of a great college readiness plan. Read more in this article from Getting Smart.

2. Helping Rural Students Leap Cultural Hurdles to College

One of the biggest challenges in increasing college attendance rates among rural students involves convincing the students’ parents to get on-board. Read more about the challenge and solutions in this article from Ed Week.

3. Branstad Unveils Blueprint for Education in Iowa

Iowa governor Terry Branstad recently announced “a reform plan that raises the bar for admittance to teacher preparation programs, replaces a century-old pay system for teachers and makes strides in eliminating social promotion,” according to the Des Moines Register.

4. Better Data Urged to Link K-12 and Postsecondary

“If high schools are going to better prepare students for college and careers, experts say they need to track graduates enrolling in higher education, whether they take remedial courses to get up to speed, and whether they earn a degree.” Read more in this article from Education Week.

EDUCAUSE 2011 Speaker Spotlight: Link Alander, Associate Vice Chancellor

October 6th, 2011

As a lead-up to this year’s EDUCAUSE conference, we’re interviewing some of the speakers who will be sharing their knowledge and experience at the conference. It’s our hope that these interviews will spark conversation and give conference attendees a better sense of this year’s speakers.

Link Alander is the Associate Vice Chancellor of the Lone Star College System. He is giving a presentation at this year’s conference entitled “The Lean and Green by Design.” Link was kind enough to answer a few questions about the most rewarding aspects of his job, the importance of green design, and more.

For more EDUCAUSE-related posts, click here.

1. As Associate Vice Chancellor of such a broad school network, what are the most rewarding aspects of what you do?

The most rewarding events of course is the fall opening and graduation. From a technology standpoint the most rewarding aspects are when faculty use the technology foundation to teach in innovative ways. Using technology to engage students and challenge them is impressive. The faculty know how to reach students using technology we, Office of Technology Services, have to be able to support and sustain these initiatives.

2. Why have you chosen to make green design a priority at Lone Star College?

The best answer to this is on our green IT initiative’s charter:

As the trends of the Technology Industry move toward a more energy conscience, sustainable model; the LSCS Office of Technology Services has committed to being a leader in this arena by engaging in more Eco friendly practices.

There are two major factors that lead to this shift in focus.

As an institution of Higher Education, we have the social responsibility to address this issue and be a leader in the community.
As stewards of tax payers’ dollars, we have a fiscal responsibility to manage costs and improve efficiencies.

3. What are some of the biggest lessons you have learned from your use of virtualization? Are there any particular companies or consultants you would recommend to a colleague who is attempting to follow in the footsteps of Lone Star College?

We have learned a lot from our use of virtualization and the cloud. Our key objective to start was to replace aging hardware and improve service availability. The end results support our 5-nines up-time initiative and have significantly improve our ability to meet our institution’s needs – enterprise agility. It doesn’t take months to bring new services on-line anymore.

We focused on key strategic partnerships with industry leaders. When moving to a highly virtualized environment, currently 93% to include our ERP, you must have the best in class solutions. We partnered with HP, VMware, EMC and Cisco on the hardware/software solutions. We also partnered with SHI on the conversion of the campus servers from physical to virtual.

4. What do you feel are the most significant issues/challenges institutions face in developing sustainable, cost-efficient IT management models?

Once the direction is set it is not a problem. The biggest issue is that this is an on-going “best practice” not a onetime project. To be successful green needs to be part of every IT decision.

5. Where do you see the future of lean and green IT headed?

This is a hard question because there are so many directions to go in. From a pure IT standpoint for us it is to reduce the power cost even further on the endpoint (computing) devices. The other item that has to expand is the institutions involvement – expand to reach all areas of the campus, especially students. Another direction that we have also been perusing is a regional green consortium that consists of K12, CC and universities. This has been making headway as a sharing group for successes and failures.

6. Are there any other sessions or events you’re looking forward to attending at this year’s EDUCAUSE Conference?

I always enjoy the EDUCAUSE sections and typically go to many sessions that are not directly related to what I do. The reason for this is to see other perspectives. Since I mainly support infrastructure and operations I like to attend technology in the classroom sessions. Often I get the opportunity to bring back ideas to discuss with faculty members. So far I have not had a chance to plan my schedule but I’ll let you know if something jumps out.

The EdTweet Show: Online Textbooks, Blogging in Class, and More [VIDEO]

October 6th, 2011

Welcome to the second installment of The EdTweet Show! In this episode, hosts Jess and Jen again give a 2-minute rundown of four interesting edtech articles that popped up in our Twitter feed this week. Check out stories about online textbooks, blogging in elementary school, and more.

You can find the full list of this week’s EdTech Tweets You May Have Missed below the video!

EdTech Blogs We Love: Web 2.0 Classroom, ICT in Education, The Innovative Educator

October 5th, 2011

It’s been a while since our last installment of EdTech Blogs We Love. Here are 3 more to add to the list!

Blogging about the Web 2.0 Classroom

Steven Anderson, the author of Blogging about the Web 2.0 Classroom, is well-known both for his blog and his prolific Twitter feed, @web20classroom. Steven is a District Instructional Technology, in which capacity he “[works] with district and school administrators on how to harness the power of technology to enhance learning.”

From roundups of new edtech resources to insightful posts on the challenges (and rewards) of teaching and learning in the digital age, Blogging about the Web 2.0 Classroom is a must-read resource for teachers and anyone who wants to connect with today’s evolving classroom on the ground level.

Don’t miss posts like:

ICT in Education: The Educational Technology Site

ICT in Education: The Educational Technology Site is a comprehensive site written and curated by Terry Freedman, an educational consultant in the UK who has also worked as a teacher and administrator. Intended for ICT leaders, Terry’s site contains news about the latest edtech resources, provocative thought-pieces about the current and future state of the classroom, links to professional development resources for ICT managers, and more.

Don’t miss posts like:

The Innovative Educator

Written by Lisa Nielson, an educational administrator and permanently certified teacher, The Innovative Educator is a resource- and knowledge-sharing destination for educators and anyone interested in edtech. Lisa, who regularly encourages educators to “Think Outside the Ban,” in order to capitalize on the potential of technology to transform education, writes thoughtful posts on helpful edtech resources, pressing ed reform issues, and more.

Don’t miss posts like:

 

MBA Admissions Tip: Word Limits

October 5th, 2011

This week’s MBA admissions tip comes to us from our friends at Clear Admit. For more expert MBA admissions advice, check out their blog.

With applicants for the round one deadlines putting the finishing touches on their applications, the question of how strictly applicants need to adhere to word limits is perhaps more popular than ever. MBA candidates naturally have a good deal of information they want – and need – to convey in their materials, and getting the important ideas down under restrictive word counts is a difficult task. While it might be tempting to run a bit beyond the guidelines to slip in that one extra thought, it’s important to keep the reasons for word limits in mind.

In addition to being a forum for explaining your goals and sharing your story, the essays also serve as a test of the applicant’s ability to communicate clearly and concisely, not to mention follow directions and answer a question. Because business schools and post-MBA employers place a premium on all of these elements, adhering to word counts ultimately works to the candidate’s advantage.

The other consideration is the reader’s time. Because of high application volume and the need to give every applicant fair and thorough consideration, schools are forced to limit the amount of information in each file. If you consistently extend your answers beyond the suggested limits, you are essentially asking the reader to give you more time than they are devoting to the other applicants. In other words, if you were to ignore the word limits and overshoot by 30% throughout, this might imply that you consider yourself to be 20% more interesting than everyone else who applied.

That being said, there is some leeway. For the vast majority of programs, it’s generally acceptable to exceed the word limit by 10%. There are, of course, a few exceptions:

Caveat #1: If a school gives you a range (e.g. 250-750 words), you should ideally stay within that range.
Caveat #2: If a school gives you a page limit (e.g. 2 pages), you should stay within that limit – without excessive margin manipulation or font size reduction.

In terms of the other end of the length issue, it is likely unwise to consistently fall more than 10% below the word limits, as this is valuable room in which to share further information about your candidacy (and might signal a lack of effort, experience, or accomplishments).

Best of luck to all those working on their application essays!

MBA News Roundup: Wharton’s Global Engagement Series in Mumbai, Non-Traditional MBA Career Paths, and More

October 3rd, 2011

Welcome to another installment of Knewton’s MBA News Roundup! This week, check out articles on Wharton’s new program in India, non-traditional MBA career paths, and how students are using social media to figure out b-schools.


Wharton b-school is launching a Global Engagement series in Mumbai, designed to meet the needs of high-potential business leaders in India.

“The Roots, Rituals and Rhetorics of Change: North American Business Schools After the Second World War,” describes the revolution in business education that took place in the 1950s and 1960s.

Business degrees becoming increasingly popular with circus performers and other members of the social fringe.

Eighty-five percent of potential students worldwide use social media to research schools, a survey by the MBA Tour reports.

The Idiot’s Guide to GMAT Idioms

October 3rd, 2011

You may have heard that the GMAT is no longer testing idioms. You also may have heard that the first 10 questions on the GMAT are the most important. You also may have heard that Lindsey Lohan is great at Data Sufficiency.

Why do you believe everything you hear?

Dr. Lawrence Rudner is the Vice President of Research and Development at the Graduate Management Admission Council. In other words, he is The Man with regards to the GMAT. Here is what he has to say on the matter: “Some Sentence Correction items continue to pose reasoning tasks that incorporate English-language, NOT American, idioms. These are not intended to test specialized knowledge of colloquialisms and regionalisms.”

In other words, the GMAT will continue to require you to understand which of the two following sentences is correct.

I am capable of acing the GMAT.

I am capable to ace the GMAT.

You should know that the adjective “capable” is always followed by the preposition “of” and a gerund. There is no need to memorize hundreds of idioms: your Knewton core work, the practice on the freely available GMAT Prep software, and (if you still need more questions) the GMAT Official Guides should be sufficient to learn all the commonly tested idioms.

The idioms you do not need to learn are those that are specific to American, or any other, culture. For example, Americans sometimes use the phrase “He’s gone bananas” to mean that someone has gone a little crazy. This phrase, however, would not necessarily suggest that meaning in other cultures.

There are also some rumors out there that Sentence Correction is changing. Once again, I’ll defer to the estimable Dr. Rudner: “In recent years, GMAT item writers have been concentrating on the reasoning aspects rather than the purely grammatical aspects of Sentence Correction skills…. This means that whereas two sentences may both be grammatically appropriate, the correct answer is the sentence that is most ‘effective’ ─ the sentence that better expresses the idea.”

So there is no change, just a continuation of a policy that has existed for at least a few years: clarity of expression, as well as grammar, is tested in Sentence Correction. This should come as no surprise to Knewton students. Our lessons emphasize that the SC sections tests meaning and clarity as well as grammar.  So there may be two grammatically correct answer choices, but only one will clearly express the meaning implied by the question prompt.

As I close this blog post, I want to give a special thanks to GMAC’s Director of Field Marketing, Joanna Graham, who responded to an email in 5 minutes on a Saturday night. Why we are both working at 8:45 on a Saturday…  well, that’s an issue for another post.

You can see the full text of Dr. Rudner’s post here.

 

EDUCAUSE 2011 Speaker Spotlight: Carlyn Chatfield, Manager of IT Technical Communications

October 3rd, 2011

As a lead-up to this year’s EDUCAUSE conference, we’re interviewing some of the speakers who will be sharing their knowledge and experience at the conference. It’s our hope that these interviews will spark conversation and give conference attendees a better sense of this year’s speakers.

Carlyn Chatfield is the Manager of IT Technical Communications at Rice University. She and four other IT leaders are conducing a session at EDUCAUSE 2011 entitled “Effective Project Deployment: Six Steps to Keep Them Coming Back.” Carlyn was kind enough to answer a few questions via email about her role at Rice, EDUCAUSE and more.

For more EDUCAUSE-related posts, click here.

1.What do your day-to-day responsibilities entail?

Managing IT communications for Rice is both interesting and rewarding. Today, I distributed a message about a service that was temporarily off-line, continued refining plans for an undergraduate study break to raise awareness about IT services and support for students, designed a student newspaper ad about the new mobile app for our course management tool, and helped create a web site for information about a security initiative.  I love being the connection between our technology gurus and our customers!

2. What was the inspiration for your presentation on Effective Project Deployment? Without giving too much away, why do you think IT leaders and project managers should concern themselves with the “business value” of their projects?

Many of us in the EDUCAUSE IT Communications constituency group work in positions that were created in the last 5-7 years.  Because our role is a relatively new one, we are always interested in helping administrators learn how they can leverage our experience.

As far as inspiration, Dana Hoover at Pepperdine said it is “everyone’s job in IT (not just the CIO or VP) to communicate the value of IT to University administration and to the end user community.”   We can easily communicate IT value through the projects we facilitate for the university, so this is a logical starting point to successfully influence our peers’ and leaders’ perceptions about IT. In today’s environment, IT projects must be both efficient and effective. I believe that good communication is at the root of both values.

3. What are some of the biggest challenges you’ve encountered in the process of implementing IT changes at Rice?

All of us are resistant to change to some degree. For example, I still struggle with our growing adoption of ITIL best practices; I thought “my way” was working and wondered why I have to learn something new and different.  More recently, I realized I am good at my job because of my attention to detail, but I don’t see the big picture.  Two of our directors looked at the big picture and saw how implementing ITIL could provide a cohesive platform for growth – something that was missing when each individual was singing “My Way.”  Communications play a strong role in ITIL, so as the communications manager I need to get with the program!

4. Since you’ve presented at Educause before, do you have any recommendations for first-timers (presenters and/or attendees)?

Join an Educause Constituency Group (CG) and find out when they meet! Connecting with colleagues who face similar challenges and opportunities is one of the most important aspects of the conference.  In addition to our CG meeting during the event, a lot of the IT Communicators try to meet casually at meals during the conference.

5. What’s your favorite part about EDUCAUSE?

In the past, it was our IT Communicators Supper Club, but I’ve heard EDUCAUSE has added a “lounge for CGs” this year. That sounds ideal for those of us who want a quiet place to chat about specific issues but can’t make meal meetings due to conflicts with other EDUCAUSE groups or teams.